<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pencil and ink, side by side (i).</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/</link>
	<description>Pencil Philosophy: Wooden Wisdom, Product Reviews &#38; Ephemera, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:05:42 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorai</title>
		<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-828</guid>
		<description>I once tried the PaperMate version myself, and it was pretty awful -- it recalled my experiences of reaching for a ball-point pen to do something important and finding that the ink wouldn&#039;t flow and then frantically shaking it to no effect.  But: I&#039;m curious what problem the liquid-lead pencil is supposed to solve? If its output is supposed to be just like a pencil&#039;s, it loses to an actual wood-cased pencil in that one can&#039;t hold it in any position (not to mention cost disadvantage).  Does it (at least the better versions of it) perhaps require less pressure from the user&#039;s hand and shoulder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once tried the PaperMate version myself, and it was pretty awful &#8212; it recalled my experiences of reaching for a ball-point pen to do something important and finding that the ink wouldn&#8217;t flow and then frantically shaking it to no effect.  But: I&#8217;m curious what problem the liquid-lead pencil is supposed to solve? If its output is supposed to be just like a pencil&#8217;s, it loses to an actual wood-cased pencil in that one can&#8217;t hold it in any position (not to mention cost disadvantage).  Does it (at least the better versions of it) perhaps require less pressure from the user&#8217;s hand and shoulder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve L.</title>
		<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>steve L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Speaking of LL pencils...The massive conglomerate that makes papermate pencils, (did I ever think I&#039;d see that - its like &#039;kosher porkchops&#039;) recently tried to sell, and may still be selling a disposable version of the liquid lead pencil, - I forget what they call it -  But there is a reason why Parker didn&#039;t keep selling the liquid lead pencil. It stinks. Imagine a rollerball with a very pale grey ink - if these where to be given a number grade like a real lead pencil, the ones I got give a line about like a 9H.  Its a great concept, but so far no one seems to be able to get a liquid lead that approaches HB or darker in real world conditions.
I suspect someone at corporate level, that overseas pens, looked through Parkers patents and/or archives, and thought maybe they could revive the idea with modern technology. But it seems they couldn&#039;t do any better than Parker did back in the 1950s. 
So if you find one of the Liquid Lead parkers, keep it as a good example of a genuine new idea in pencils, that still hasn&#039;t been perfected. Fortunately, Parker mechanical pencils of a more conventional type, are very high quality, and usually cost a lot less than their Fountain pen companions on the collectors market...(I&#039;ve got a .9mm propel/repel/expel that matches the Parker 45, red barrel, steel top, gold clip and tassie. Erasers still available. I love it...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of LL pencils&#8230;The massive conglomerate that makes papermate pencils, (did I ever think I&#8217;d see that &#8211; its like &#8216;kosher porkchops&#8217;) recently tried to sell, and may still be selling a disposable version of the liquid lead pencil, &#8211; I forget what they call it &#8211;  But there is a reason why Parker didn&#8217;t keep selling the liquid lead pencil. It stinks. Imagine a rollerball with a very pale grey ink &#8211; if these where to be given a number grade like a real lead pencil, the ones I got give a line about like a 9H.  Its a great concept, but so far no one seems to be able to get a liquid lead that approaches HB or darker in real world conditions.<br />
I suspect someone at corporate level, that overseas pens, looked through Parkers patents and/or archives, and thought maybe they could revive the idea with modern technology. But it seems they couldn&#8217;t do any better than Parker did back in the 1950s.<br />
So if you find one of the Liquid Lead parkers, keep it as a good example of a genuine new idea in pencils, that still hasn&#8217;t been perfected. Fortunately, Parker mechanical pencils of a more conventional type, are very high quality, and usually cost a lot less than their Fountain pen companions on the collectors market&#8230;(I&#8217;ve got a .9mm propel/repel/expel that matches the Parker 45, red barrel, steel top, gold clip and tassie. Erasers still available. I love it&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-814</guid>
		<description>The difference between pen and pencil can blur at times - Parker and others made a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.penhero.com/PenGallery/Parker/ParkerLiquidLeadPencil.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;liquid lead pencil&lt;/a&gt; a few decades ago.

On the flip side, copying and indelible pencils may contain ink-like dyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between pen and pencil can blur at times &#8211; Parker and others made a <a href="http://www.penhero.com/PenGallery/Parker/ParkerLiquidLeadPencil.htm" rel="nofollow">liquid lead pencil</a> a few decades ago.</p>
<p>On the flip side, copying and indelible pencils may contain ink-like dyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eolt</title>
		<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Eolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-807</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more! Untill recently my handwriting was illegable. Writing with a fountain pen improved it greatly. However pencils have always had a place in my heart. Even though my writing is better I like writing with a fountain pen, but a pencil is always in my pocket.(along with wallet, keys, multi tool,mechanical pencil, fountain pen, gell pen,and rollerball)(yes I have a lot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more! Untill recently my handwriting was illegable. Writing with a fountain pen improved it greatly. However pencils have always had a place in my heart. Even though my writing is better I like writing with a fountain pen, but a pencil is always in my pocket.(along with wallet, keys, multi tool,mechanical pencil, fountain pen, gell pen,and rollerball)(yes I have a lot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve L.</title>
		<link>http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 05:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pencilrevolution.com/2006/03/pencil-and-ink-side-by-side-i/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Yes!  pens AND pencils.  coffee AND tea. dogs AND cats.  rice AND beans...  a plea for tolerance, for an understanding of the &#039;other&#039;....    but much remains to be done.
to paraphrase Orwell, &#039;All writing instruments are equal, but some writing instruments are more equal than others...&quot;    power to the pencil.... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes!  pens AND pencils.  coffee AND tea. dogs AND cats.  rice AND beans&#8230;  a plea for tolerance, for an understanding of the &#8216;other&#8217;&#8230;.    but much remains to be done.<br />
to paraphrase Orwell, &#8216;All writing instruments are equal, but some writing instruments are more equal than others&#8230;&#8221;    power to the pencil&#8230;. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
